Quantcast
Channel: Military & Defense
Viewing all 27697 articles
Browse latest View live

One Man Had To Analyze Every Sickening Picture From Abu Ghraib To Identify Torture: Here's His Story

$
0
0

abu ghraib painting tortureIn this excerpt from The Ballad Of Abu Ghraib, Philip Gourevitch presents an interview with the lead forensic examiner assigned to study the infamous Abu Ghraib prisoner abuse photographs. 

A week after the Abu Ghraib photographs were made public, the president said that he was “sorry for the humiliation suffered by the Iraqi prisoners and the humiliation suffered by their families” and “equally sorry that people seeing these pictures didn’t understand the true nature and heart of America” and, he said, “the wrongdoers will be brought to justice.”

Shortly afterward Special Agent Brent Pack, the lead forensic examiner of the computer crime unit of the US Army Criminal Investigative Division (CID), was handed 12 compact discs and told: These contain pictures from Abu Ghraib—thousands of pictures. We want you to find the ones that depict possible prisoner abuse, or people that were in the area at the times abuse was occurring. And we want to know exactly when the pictures were taken. Put them on a time line so that a jury can see when each incident began and when it ended; how much time elapsed in between these photographs; how much effort went into what these people were doing to the prisoners; and who else was there when these things occurred.

waterboard paintingSo Pack set about culling the files. He eliminated duplicates and a great many pictures that had nothing to do with abuse, or even with Abu Ghraib, and he was left with some 280 photographs.

“There’s about 12 separate days that they took pictures that were pertinent to this investigation," he said. "There’s 26 separate incidents of possible abuse. Each one of these incidents, somebody was responsible for what occurred. So you have to figure it out. Who was here for this one? Who was here for that one? And does this one actually constitute a crime or is it standard operating procedure? You have to look at exactly what the pictures depict and take the emotion and the politics out of it, because you are dealing with people that are basically going to be on trial for their freedom. It was important to separate those that were criminal acts and those things that were not criminal acts. And that’s what the prosecution would have to focus on. If somebody was actually physically injured, you know you have a criminal act. Putting somebody into sexually humiliating positions, you have a criminal act. Making them abuse themselves sexually, you have a criminal act. Standing by and watching somebody hit their head on the wall and taking photographs at the time, that’s dereliction of duty, so it’s a criminal act. The individual with the wires tied to their hands and standing on a box, I see that as somebody that’s being put into a stress position. I’m looking at it and thinking, they don’t look like they’re real electrical wires. Standard operating procedure—that’s all it is."

Nudity, panties on the head, Palestinian hangings—these, too, Pack regarded as standard operating procedure.

abu ghraib

“I’ve been in the Army for twenty years,” he said. “I’ve been to Desert Storm. I spent four months at Guantánamo Bay. People that haven’t been where I’ve been, I can’t expect them to see the pictures in the same way. All a picture is, is frozen moments of time and of reality. You can interpret them differently, based on your background or your knowledge. But when it comes time where you’re presenting them in court, what the photograph depicts is what it is."

And, he said, what it came down to was: “If you were in the pictures while this stuff was going on, you were going to be in trouble. If you made our president apologize to the world, I would say you’d be in big trouble.”

Pack was a technician. He was not concerned with motives, only with actions. But when he looked at the pictures of what he called “the infamous seven-man naked Iraqi stacking pyramid,” he said, “The facial expressions that you see on [Specialist Charles A.] Graner and [Specialist Sabrina D.] Harman kind of set the tone for what they were thinking and what they were feeling at the time. You look in their eyes, and it looks like they were having fun, and to me this scene is what sealed their fate.” 

prisoners “In all my years as a cop, I’d say over half of all my cases were solved because the criminal did something stupid. Taking photographs of these things is that one something stupid," he said.

He had spent months studying the pictures, and the soldiers who took them and appeared in them, and he said, “I think they thought what they were doing was acceptable. What is acceptable behavior gets fuzzy in war.” 

He said he had no emotional response to the pictures while he worked on them. He took pride in his clinical detachment, and what he considered to be his apolitical objectivity. Still, as a soldier, an MP no less, and as a citizen, he could not help trying to make sense of what he saw. He didn’t see torture; he saw humiliation, and he saw that it cut both ways. “Absolutely,” he said. “These pictures humiliated us.”

Excerpted from The Ballad Of Abu Ghraib by Philip Gourevitch. Excerpted with permission by The Penguin Press. Copyright © 2008. All rights reserved.

Join the conversation about this story »


Here Are 6 Possible Nightmare Scenarios For 2015 In Asia

$
0
0

Council on Foreign Relations

A terrorist attack on US soil, an armed confrontation in the South China Sea, and a war between Azerbaijan and Armenia are just three of the 34 geopolitical risks that the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) has included in their interactive Global Conflict Tracker for the upcoming year. 

Each year CFR releases the Global Conflict Tracker in an attempt to forecast worldwide global events that would affect the US and its interests. 

CFR surveyed more than 2,200 government officials, foreign policy experts, and academics in an attempt to best understand the risks facing the US based on both its likelihood of a given event to occur in 2015 along with its possible impact on US interests. High impact events are those that would directly threaten US territory, trigger a US military response, or threaten the supply of a critical resource. 

We have briefed the top five threats in Asia, starting with the potentially most severe, with links to CFR's analysis for further details. 

Armed Confrontation In The South China Sea

Philippine Navy firing near south china sea

Moderate likelihood; high impact

China's claims to the South China Sea, along with the estimated 11 billion barrels of oil and 190 trillion cubic feet of natural gas in the sea bed beneath, has led to frictions between a group of powerful competing claimants that include Malaysia, Taiwan, the Philippines, Vietnam, and Indonesia.

The overall cause of concern is that the US may be drawn into conflict with China through a defensive treaty it currently has with the Philippines. 

Crisis In North Korea

north korea soldiers

Moderate likelihood; high impact

Kim Jong-Un's purges of the political elite in North Korea have led to an increased risk of unrest in the country, perhaps in the form of a coup attempt or some other kind of internal disruption. Pyongyang has also continued to develop and test nuclear weapons, raising tensions through the region. The US estimates that at minimum the North has enough plutonium to create five nuclear weapons. 

Sino-Japanese Confrontation In The East China Sea

China Fishing Boats East China Sea

Low likelihood; high impact

China and Japan remain embroiled in a competition over the ultimate sovereignty of the Senkaku Islands, an increasing focal point for nationalist sentiments on both sides. Military escalation between the two nations would risk drawing the US into a conflict with China after Obama stated that the US-Japanese security pact covers the islands. 

Confrontation Between India And Pakistan

4. India

Low likelihood; moderate impact

India and Pakistan have engaged in three wars since their independence from Britan, two of which were fought over the disputed region of Kashmir. The nations have stuck to a shaky ceasefire since 2003 although exchanges of artillery fire in October quickly heightened tensions again. Both sides have also invested heavily in nuclear technology and developed new long-range missiles. 

A Clash Between China And India

China military

Low likelihood; low impact

China and India share the world's longest disputed border with both countries claiming land near Kashmir and south of Tibet. Border disputes led the two nations to war in 1962. Since then, India has frequently complained of Chinese troops slowly pushing further and further into disputed territory.

Ethnic Unrest In China

Xinjiang China Police

Moderate likelihood; low impact

China's Uighur-dominated Xinjiang Province is still a source of potentially instability. The Uighurs, a Muslim Turkic group, face various forms of discrimination from a heavy-handed Chinese government. Increasingly, Uighurs have taken to public demonstrations and, in some cases, terrorist attacks throughout China to further the goals of greater autonomy within China or even independence. 

You can read the full report here»

SEE ALSO: This epic map shows the border disputes that could tear Asia apart

Join the conversation about this story »

Putin Now Faces 'One Of Those Guns Or Butter Moments'

$
0
0

putinRapid changes in the financial markets and the Russian economy are forcing Vladimir Putin to change his calculus.

Now the Russian president has a choice between doubling down on his aggressive foreign policy or concentrate on putting Russia in order.

This week's plunge in the value of the ruble adds another layer of uncertainty to the ongoing faceoff between Russia and the West.

The currency crisis, precipitated by US and EU sanctions against Moscow and a global decline in oil prices, threatens to crater the country's lucrative state-owned enterprises and send the economy into a nosedive.

The question is how an ever-unpredictable Vladimir Putin will respond.

Putin's nationalistic and often-aggressive policies have appealed to Russians' post-Cold War sense of grievance and won him soaring approval ratings at a time when the Russian president is loathed in most western capitals.

But the ruble dive threatens to radically shift the conditions that have allowed Putin to maintain his internal popularity in spite of the western powers' opposition to him. 

As New York University professor and Russia expert Mark Galeotti explained to Business Insider, Putin's rule is predicated on a "social contract" that most Russians have found acceptable: "You stay out of politics. You show enthusiasm but don't think you actually get a meaningful say in government. In return for that your life will improve and continue to improve."

Under Putin, Russia achieved perhaps the highest standard of living in the country's history while the government was able to replenish its coffers after periods of actual bankruptcy under Boris Yeltsin in the 1990s. Weaknesses remained: The new prosperity was largely distributed through Putin's hand-picked former KGB colleagues and much of the country's wealth depended upon robust oil prices and access to European markets. Record military spending also threatens to sap resources and hamstring any government response to a future economic crisis.

The recent decline in oil prices, along with the economic consequences of international sanctions, could bring Putin's arrangement crashing down around him. "This social contract is being torn up," says Galeotti. "But Putin could tear it up more quickly and more assiduously if he's still determined to maintain his aggressive geopolitical stance. It really is one of those guns or butter moments."

RUB vs Oil

Galeotti believes that Moscow may send additional troops to eastern Ukraine in the hopes of pressuring Kiev into a settlement that would result in the lifting of international sanctions. But the chances of immediate escalation — beyond the Kremlin's current spate of military mobilizations and provocative military flights near and even in European airspace — remain low.

Putin has nothing to gain from fresh geopolitical turmoil, especially now. "If we assume that Putin and company want to maximize their chances of exiting this crisis with their fortunes and, ideally, their political power mostly intact, then they need to worry about how NATO and the markets will respond to fresh aggression," Jay Ulfedler, a political scientist and director of the Early Warning Project, told Business Insider. "At this point, I don't see many options for new aggression that carry serious domestic benefits for Russia and don't risk huge new costs, perhaps including a direct war with NATO."

But that's only in the short term. The Russian state has enough money to backstop the ruble for the time being and Moscow has the ability to bail out some of the state's vital assets. "The country’s strategic reserves may be (and I think will be) dispatched to help save some of the industries and businesses that are considered strategic (RosNeft and GazProm are first in that list), but others may be sacrificed," Hannah Thoburn, a Eurasia analyst at the Foreign Policy Initiative, told Business Insider. 

The alternative is economic collapse and the severing of Putin's social contract — a scenario that could lead to internal disruptions serious enough to put Russia on an even more more aggressive footing.

In an economic worst-case scenario, Russia could see "an increasing tide of protest" and "an accretion of signs of concern" as popular discontent grows, Galeotti explains. In that situation, "the elite may also start to wonder if Putin is really the guy they want in charge." 

In the face of public backlash and internal revolt, the long-serving Russian president may feel he has little choice but to rally nationalistic sentiment and push his advantage over his western rivals, which currently resides in the Kremlin's willingness to violently impose its will and violate the sovereignty of Russia's European neighbors. 

putin

Geopolitical expert Ian Bremmer told Business Insider that if he feels he's backed into a corner, Putin's options include more cyberattacks, "more aggression/incursion around NATO borders, excuses found for expansion of military engagement beyond present zone in Russia, [and] closer ties/integration with China."

And then there's the worst-case scenario, an economic meltdown bad enough to convince Putin that the continuity of his rule is under threat. Galeotti says that complete Russian economic collapse is "a possibility but not a probability." But as he notes, "imperial adventurism" in the face of political or social crisis is a Kremlin tactic dating back to the disastrous Russo-Japanese war in 1905

It's one that Putin could resort to if things get worse. And between eastern Moldova, eastern Ukraine, and parts of Kazakhstan, former Soviet possessions that many Russians believe to be part of the national patrimony, Putin wouldn't have a shortage of obvious targets. 

SEE ALSO: 6 possible nightmare scenarios in Asia in 2015

Join the conversation about this story »

The US Navy Has An Awesome Collection Of Historical Artifacts

$
0
0

5983076329_aaedafd05f_o

The US Naval History and Heritage Command announced Tuesday that it completed the transfer of massive amount of historical artifacts from the Washington Navy Yard to their new home in Richmond, Virginia.

The transfer is part of an ongoing project to move more than 300,000 artifacts — from Operation Iraqi Freedom to the Revolutionary War — to the Richmond headquarters, the Navy said. Among other items, the collection includes weapons obtained from enemy soldiers, gifts from foreign countries, flags, plaques, and toys.

"We have literally tons of material, some of which is priceless, and nearly all of it irreplaceable. But the work is well worth it if it means in the long run our Sailors and our citizens can better appreciate what the Navy has meant to our country since its inception," head curator Karen France said in a statement.

Hundreds of photos from the collection can be found on the Naval History & Heritage Command's Flickr page. We highlighted some of the more interesting items below:

Civil War amputation instrument case:

4647659324_c06a56b3f1_o

The original donor of this sword said it "was captured by Beale English in hand-to-hand combat with a Berber at Tripoli. The enemy was killed and the sword taken as a trophy." 

5039283126_bc4b2bc6f4_o

The 34 star flag was used from 1861 until 1863. This flag was used by in the Mississippi River campaign during the Civil War:

7803414058_7c1f238712_o

This IBM Thinkpad computer was recovered from the Pentagon following the September 11th 2001 terrorist attack:

5891422370_68a45b6c25_o

Sensor that was deployed from aircraft during the Vietnam War. Its antenna would pick up and relay troop movements:

4690443697_0126d05023_o

Safe conduct pass, issued by American forces and air dropped in Vietnam to encourage defection of North Vietnamese and Viet Cong forces: 7008910433_6869c2b0b1_o

This sword was presented to Lt. Stevens by the city of Charleston in recognition of his service during the War of 1812's Battle of Lake Eerie:

7074296553_62dd8e9e92_o

An August Sauter pharmacy scale with original wood box:

11715228076_ce5ccf94c1_o

Camera developed by Eastman Kodak in1941 and manufactured until 1948. It was used extensively by the United States Navy during World War II:

6012215634_88e02838f5_o

The US Navy provided medical assistance and supplies to Japan in 1923 after a major earthquake. In appreciation of the Navy's assistance the International Banking Corporation presented this ship model to Admiral Thomas Washington:

4441270940_586519b69e_o

Assault rifle built by Tabuk in Iraq to the specifications of Mikhail Kalashnikov's AK-47. The rifle is gold plated and was seized during Operation Iraqi Freedom:

gold ak47 in iraq

This German, Mauser Model 712 was recovered by Lt John Millard Weeks, US Gunnery Officer, USS Ellyson DD-454, following the Allied invasion of Normandy June 1944, in an abandoned german defensive bunker:

5208753253_63741b027f_o

This 48-star flag was made from a white bedsheet with colored pencils by prisoners in Japan. It flew in 1945:

9023910757_ee46879f12_o

 

Join the conversation about this story »

The Hackers' New Threats Show Just How Unique The Cyber Attack On Sony Has Been

$
0
0

seth rogen james franco

The group claiming to be behind the Sony hack has stepped up its campaign of intimidation by threatening to carry out terrorist attacks against movie theaters, media outlets report citing a message on filesharing services. 

The Guardians of Peace (GOP), a group that is believed to have some kind of connection to North Korea, has threatened to carry out attacks against movie theaters that screen the Seth Rogen and James Franco film The Interview, in which two talk show hosts are sent to the country to assassinate Kim Jong-Un.

"Warning," GOP warned on filesharing sites. "We will clearly show it to you at the very time and places 'The Interview' be shown, including the premiere, how bitter fate those who seek fun in terror should be doomed to." 

"The world will be full of fear," the hacker group went on to warn. "Remember the 11th of September 2001." 

The warning of physical terror attacks has substantially upped the ante of the previous cyber attack against the company. Though unprecedented in its severity and in its likely state backing, the Sony hack currently is not definable as an act of war. But any terrorist attack carried out against US targets would increase the chances of a military confrontation. 

Currently, there are is no definite proof linking North Korea to the GOP. But Pyongyang has voiced strong support over the Sony hack, indicating that the GOP is likely a proxy group run by North Korea.

“The hacking into the SONY Pictures might be a righteous deed of the supporters and sympathizers with the DPRK in response to its appeal,” the Korean Central News Agency stated in a report. “What matters here is that the US set the DPRK as the target of the investigation, far from reflecting on its wrongdoings and being (ashamed) of being taken unawares."

Whether or not this is a credible threat, the prospect of terrorism over The Interview's premier and release ultimately serves the purposes of the North Korean officials and supporters who want Sony to scrap the film. 

Sony is already reeling from the steady release of 12 terabytes of personal data stolen from Sony's internal servers. And if the the film is pulled, state-backed hackers would have coerced a major US company into significantly altering its practices, causing them to shelve one of their products out of fear of the commercial or reputational damage that would follow another cyber attack.

Again, this doens't fit the US's definition of an act of cyber war, which requires some kind of physical damage as the result of a hack. But the new threats underscore just how unique the Sony hacks have been. With North Korea's involvement, the incident combines "national rivalry, hacker ideology, performance art, ritual humiliation and data combustion, culminating in complete corporate chaos," as John Gapper explained in the Financial Times. And the hackers are now attempting to raise the stakes even higher.

Sony already announced on Monday, before the threat was posted, that it was scaling down the New York premier of The Interview on Thursday. 

Read the full message below (via BuzzFeed):

Warning

We will clearly show it to you at the very time and places “The Interview” be shown, including the premiere, how bitter fate those who seek fun in terror should be doomed to.
Soon all the world will see what an awful movie Sony Pictures Entertainment has made.
The world will be full of fear.
Remember the 11th of September 2001.
We recommend you to keep yourself distant from the places at that time.
(If your house is nearby, you’d better leave.)
Whatever comes in the coming days is called by the greed of Sony Pictures Entertainment.
All the world will denounce the SONY.

SEE ALSO: The US needs to stop pretending the Sony hack is anything less than an act of war

Join the conversation about this story »

Here's How Many 'Super Nukes' American Scientists Thought It Would Take To Destroy The World In 1945

$
0
0

Nuclear explosion

Shortly after the end of World War II, the scientists who developed the atomic bombs dropped on Japan tried to envision the kind of nuclear event that could lead to the destruction of not just cities, but the entire world.

A recently declassified document shared by nuclear historian Alex Wellerstein gives the verdict that scientists at the Los Alamos laboratory and test site reached in 1945. They found that "it would require only in the neighborhood of 10 to 100 Supers of this type" to put the human race in peril.

They reached this conclusion at a very early point in the development of nuclear weapons, before highly destructive multi-stage or thermonuclear devices had been built. But the scientists had an idea of the technology's grim potential. "The 'Super' they had in mind was what we would now call a hydrogen bomb," Wellerstein wrote in an email to Business Insider.

At the time, the scientists speculated they could make a bomb with as much deuterium — a nuclear variant of hydrogen — as they liked to give the weapon an explosive yield between 10 and 100 megatons (or millions of tons' worth of TNT).

For perspective, the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki had a yield of around 15 kilotons, or 0.015% of a megaton. These theorized bombs were several orders of magnitude more powerful than those that wrought destruction on Japan earlier that year. 

The apocalypse brought on by these 10-100 super bombs wouldn't be all fire and brimstone. The scientists posited that "the most world-wide destruction could come from radioactive poisons" unleashed on the Earth's atmosphere by the bombs' weaponized uranium. Radiation exposure leads to skyrocketing rates of cancer, birth defects, and genetic anomalies.

The Los Alamos scientists understood the threat that airborne radiation would pose in the event of nuclear war. "Atmospheric poisoning is basically making it so that the background level of radioactivity would be greatly increased, to the point that it would interfere with human life (e.g. cancers and birth defects) and reproduction (e.g. genetic anomalies)," says Wellerstein. "So they are imagining a scenario in which radioactive byproducts have gotten into the atmosphere and are spreading everywhere." 

Wellerstein says that this fear of widespread nuclear fallout was hardly irrational and that concerns over the atmospheric effects of nuclear detonations were "one of the reasons that we stopped testing nuclear weapons aboveground in 1963, as part of the Limited Test Ban Treaty."

Taking both of the estimated scales to the extreme — 100 superbombs yielding 100 megatons of fission each — would result in a total yield of 10,000 megatons. As Wellerstein notes, that's the same amount of fission that Project SUNSHINE determined was enough to  "raise the background radioactivity to highly dangerous levels" in a 1953 study.

That degree of nuclear power — though not necessarily accompanied by the radioactive component critical to meeting the fears documents here — rested in the hands of both the US and Russia during the Cold War.

russian nuke nuclear weaponsIn recent decades the total yield of US and Russian nuclear weapons has fallen, such that "the threat of over-irradiating the planet is probably not a real one, even with a full nuclear exchange," Wellerstein wrote. "A bigger concern is the amount of carbon that would be thrown up in even a limited nuclear exchange (say, between India and Pakistan), which could have detrimental global effects on the climate."

Back in 1945 the Pentagon had speculated that it would take a few hundred atomic bombs to subdue Russia.

That thought experiment had a strategic bent. But the 1945 estimate seems to have advised caution in the new,  uncertain nuclear age.

The scientific push to learn more about the destructive weapons that were so hastily researched and used in the 1940s resulted in important insights as to the consequence of their use. Nuclear weapons aren't just horrific on the intended, local scale. They can carry consequences on the planet's ability to foster human life, whether that's by contributing to the greenhouse effect or irradiating it beyond habitability. 

These warnings aside, US did end up detonating a "super bomb" in above-ground tests. The US detonated a 15 megaton device in the infamous Castle Bravo test in 1954. And the Soviet Union's Tsar Bomba, detonated in 1961, had as much as a 58 megaton yield.

SEE ALSO: Here's how the US reacted to China's first nuclear test

Join the conversation about this story »

Even The Afghan Taliban Are Saying The Pakistan Massacre Was 'Un-Islamic'

$
0
0

Pakistan school attack

The Taliban's attack on a school in northwestern Pakistan on Tuesday was so horrific that even the Afghan Taliban have condemned it.

Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid released a statement saying: "The intentional killing of innocent people, children and women are against the basics of Islam and this criteria has to be considered by every Islamic party and government."

The Pakistani Taliban and Afghan Taliban are allies but exist as separate entities, Reuters notes. Both terrorist groups seek to overthrow the governments of their respective countries and establish an Islamic State that is governed under religious sharia law.

The Pakistani Taliban killed 148 people when they attacked the military-run Army Public School and College in Peshawar. Most of those killed were children. More than 100 others were wounded.

Several gunmen stormed the school with explosive strapped onto them and started shooting people at random, according to the Associated Press.

The Taliban claimed responsibility for the attack and said they targeted the school's students as revenge for the deaths of children who were allegedly killed by army soldiers in tribal areas, CNN reports. The Taliban also reportedly wanted to target students who might go on to join the military.

SEE ALSO: Pakistan Is Paralyzed After The Taliban's Worst Terrorist Attack Ever

Join the conversation about this story »

US And Cuba Signal A Big Shift

$
0
0

alan gross lands in usa

Cuba has released American aid worker Alan Gross, 65, the ailing US aid worker held in Cuba for five years in a reported prisoner exchange with Havana.

US officials had long cited Cuba’s refusal to free Gross as one of the biggest impediments to improved relations and had held out the possibility that his release could open the door to such steps.

Following this news, traders are buzzing.

According to US Senator Richard Durbin, Gross' release comes with significant involvement by the Vatican. Gross' lawyer and family have described him as mentally vanquished, gaunt, hobbling and missing five teeth.

A US official said Gross was released on humanitarian grounds and would arrive at Joint Base Andrews outside Washington at noon on Wednesday. CNN reported a prisoner exchange that also included Cuba releasing a US intelligence source and the US releasing three Cuban intelligence agents.

President Barack Obama and Cuban President Raul Castro will both give public statements at 12 p.m. ET. According to the White House, Obama will make his noon statement from the Cabinet Room. CNN reported that Castro will speak at the same time on "international relations with the United States."

Who Is Alan Gross And Why Was He Imprisoned?

alan grossGross was a longtime supporter of Jewish causes and a career development consultant who traveled the world on private contracts before taking his Cuba assignment. He had only once previously visited Cuba and spoke very limited Spanish.

Gross worked for Maryland-based Development Alternatives Inc. (DAI), which had a $6 million deal with the USAID to promote democracy and support political dissidents. Gross signed two contracts with DAI paying him a total of $590,000 to deliver telecommunications equipment over 20 months.

During five trips to Cuba in 2009, Gross imported banned satellite communications devices and other high-tech gear in his luggage and helped install it at Jewish centers in Havana, Santiago, and Camaguey. 

Cuban officials arrested him in his hotel room on Dec. 3, 2009, just before he had planned to return home. 

Gross sued DAI and the US government for $60 million, saying he was inadequately informed of the dangers and illegality of his mission. He settled with DAI for an undisclosed sum and a judge threw out his suit against the US, a decision upheld on appeal.

Cuba later sentenced him to 15 years for attempting to establish clandestine internet service for Cuban Jews under a program run by the USAID. His case raised alarms about USAID's practice of hiring private citizens to carry out secretive assignments in hostile places.

Cuba considers USAID another instrument of continual US harassment dating to the 1959 revolution that brought Fidel Castro to power. Fidel Castro retired in 2008, handing power to his brother Raul.

The US has said it wants to promote democracy in communist-led Cuba, a one-party state that represses political opponents and controls the media. American officials accused Cuba of taking Gross hostage as a ploy to get their spies back.

The three Cuban intelligence agents, jailed since 1998, are Gerardo Hernandez, 49, Antonio Guerrero, 56, and Ramon Labañino, 51. Two others had been released before on completing their sentences — Rene Gonzalez, 58, and Fernando Gonzalez, 51.

A Change In Relations?

obama castroCiting US officials, the AP said Washington planned to open an embassy in Cuba as part of its plan to launch talks and to normalize relations.

A senior congressional aide said Obama would ease the embargo and travel restrictions that prevent most Americans from visiting the island.

The two countries have been ideological foes since soon after the 1959 revolution that brought Raul Castro's older brother, Fidel Castro, to power.

Washington and Havana have no diplomatic relations and the United States has maintained a trade embargo on Cuba for more than 50 years.

The so-called Cuban Five were convicted for spying on anti-Castro exile groups in Florida and monitoring US military installations. They are hailed as antiterrorist heroes in Cuba for defending the country by infiltrating exile groups in Florida at a time when anti-Castro extremists were bombing Cuban hotels.

Alan grossTwo were due to be released in coming years but Gerardo Hernandez, the leader, received a double life sentence for conspiracy in Cuba's shooting down of two US civilian aircraft in 1996, killing four Cuban-Americans.

The US had flatly refused to swap Gross for the agents, but the White House came under increasing pressure to intervene from Gross' allies and foreign policy experts as Gross' health deteriorated.

Gross had already lost some 100 pounds (46 kg) when he went on a five-day hunger strike in April, and upon his 65th birthday in May he vowed to die rather than turn 66 in prison.

The payoff for Obama was the release of Gross, whose lawyer and family have described him as mentally vanquished, gaunt, hobbling and missing five teeth.

According to a petition from the Jewish Community Relations Council for Gross' release, the health of Alan’s family has also deteriorated since his imprisonment. His 27-year old daughter and 89-year old mother are both battling cancer. "The financial burdens on the family are becoming insurmountable, due to the growing medical and legal bills and the loss of Alan’s income," the petition stated. 

Gross familyGross' release could lead Obama to begin normalizing relations with Cuba, which would stir fierce opposition from well-financed and politically organized Cuban exiles, who resist engagement with the communist-led island.

Whatever he announces in terms of a wider policy shift, Obama may well face criticism in Washington and within the Cuban exile community in Miami for freeing the Cuban intelligence agents after 16 years in prison. Their freedom will be hailed as a resounding victory at home for Raul Castro.

Although Obama said "we have to continue to update our policies" on Cuba over a year ago, until now he had yet to signal change.

The president has authority to unilaterally gut the US trade embargo against Cuba and allow US citizens to travel freely to the island. His State Department can remove Cuba from a list of state sponsors of terrorism, an outdated designation that carries with it further economic sanctions.

But there were already quick objections to the news from some US lawmakers. Robert Menendez, the current head of Senate Foreign Relations Committee, denounced President Barack Obama's actions on Cuba, saying they "vindicated the brutal behavior of the Cuban government."

Menendez said in a statement that trading Gross for "convicted criminals" from Cuba "sets an extremely dangerous precedent."

Similarly, US Republican Senator Marco Rubio, a Cuban-American of Florida, said the release of Gross "puts a price on Americans abroad." Speaking on Fox News, Rubio, a potential 2016 White House contender, said he did not believe that Congress would support lifting the embargo on Cuba.

Proponents of normalization note that Cuba has blamed the embargo for its economic shortcomings for decades and uses US aggression as justification for stifling dissent.

Despite bilateral animosity, the two countries have been quietly engaged on a host of issues such as immigration, drug interdiction, and oil-spill mitigation.

(Writing by Daniel Trotta and Doina Chiacu; Editing by Howard Goller)


NOW WATCH: 6 Compelling Correlations That Make Absolutely No Sense

 

Join the conversation about this story »


Democratic Senator: Obama 'Vindicated The Brutal Behavior Of The Cuban Government'

$
0
0

AP889876143943

Sen. Bob Menendez (D-New Jersey) came out swinging after the White House revealed its intent to ease US-Cuba relations Wednesday morning.

"President Obama's actions have vindicated the brutal behavior of the Cuban government," Menendez said in a statement.

Menendez, a Cuban-American and a hardliner on US-Cuba relations, was reacting to the Castro government's release of American aid worker Alan Gross as part of a prisoner exchange.

But Menendez insisted the deal was a bad one for the US.

"Let's be clear, this was not a 'humanitarian' act by the Castro regime. It was a swap of convicted spies for an innocent American," he said. "There is no equivalence between an international aid worker and convicted spies who were found guilty of conspiracy to commit espionage against our nation."

Menendez also argued the prisoner exchange will only invite more foreign despots to capture US aid workers.

"Trading Mr. Gross for three convicted criminals sets an extremely dangerous precedent. It invites dictatorial and rogue regimes to use Americans serving overseas as bargaining chips. I fear that today’s actions will put at risk the thousands of Americans that work overseas to support civil society, advocate for access to information, provide humanitarian services, and promote democratic reforms," he continued. "This asymmetrical trade will invite further belligerence toward Cuba's opposition movement and the hardening of the government’s dictatorial hold on its people."

The prisoner swap is part of a larger deal in which the two countries have agreed to negotiate towards normalizing their relations. President Barack Obama is scheduled to make a formal announcement about the new US-Cuba policy Wednesday afternoon.

View Menendez's full statement below:

"This is a moment of profound relief for Alan Gross and his family. Mr. Gross' physical and mental health has declined severely as a result of his five-year imprisonment under difficult conditions. He should have been released immediately and unconditionally five years ago. He committed no crime and was simply working to provide internet access to Cuba's small Jewish community. His imprisonment was cruel and arbitrary, but consistent with the behavior of the Cuban regime.

“Let's be clear, this was not a "humanitarian" act by the Castro regime. It was a swap of convicted spies for an innocent American.

“President Obama's actions have vindicated the brutal behavior of the Cuban government. There is no equivalence between an international aid worker and convicted spies who were found guilty of conspiracy to commit espionage against our nation. One spy was also convicted of conspiracy to murder for his role in the 1996 tragedy in which the Cuban military shot down two U.S. civilian planes, killing several American citizens. My heart goes out to the American families that lost love ones on that fateful day.

“Trading Mr. Gross for three convicted criminals sets an extremely dangerous precedent. It invites dictatorial and rogue regimes to use Americans serving overseas as bargaining chips. I fear that today’s actions will put at risk the thousands of Americans that work overseas to support civil society, advocate for access to information, provide humanitarian services, and promote democratic reforms.

“This asymmetrical trade will invite further belligerence toward Cuba's opposition movement and the hardening of the government’s dictatorial hold on its people. Let us all remind ourselves that an untold number of ordinary people yearning for democracy remain imprisoned by the exact same tormentors that have punished Alan Gross and they, along with all Cubans, deserve a free and liberated Cuba."

 

SEE ALSO: US and Cuba signal a big shift

Join the conversation about this story »

Here Are 3 Big Policy Changes In US-Cuba Relations

$
0
0

Cuban Soldiers

President Barack Obama is set to make an announcement about a major shift in US policy towards Cuba at noon on Wednesday.

Cuba released Alan Gross, a worker with the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) who was arrested in Cuba in 2009, prior to the announcement.

In a conference call with reporters ahead of the president's remarks, senior administration officials detailed the policy changes that will occur, which one described as "beginning the normalization of relations between the United States and Cuba." 

"These steps will be the most significant changes to our Cuba policy in more than 50 years," the official said. 

Relations between America and Cuba, which is located less than 100 miles from the southernmost point in the US, began to deteriorate in 1959 following the revolution that brought the Communist regime of Fidel Castro to power. The US subsequently maintained an embargo against Cuba and severed diplomatic relations. Castro's regime has been criticized by many opponents for its human rights record and repression of free speech. 

The official also detailed the different components of the US policy shift. They identified three major elements of the change:

  • The official said the US is "beginning discussions to re-establish diplomatic relations that have been severed since 1961." An official who spoke on the White House call said this would lead to the establishment of a US embassy in Cuba and a Cuban counterpart in America. In spite of this, they said the Obama administration expects to continue to have "strong differences" with Cuba, particularly on issues relating to democracy and human rights. 
  • According to the official, President Barack Obama has instructed Secretary of State John Kerry to review Cuba's designation as a state sponsor of terror.
  • Lastly, the official said the US will take a "number of steps to significantly increase travel, commerce, and the flow of information to and from Cuba." This will include an easing of current travel restrictions and efforts to make it easier for Americans to use debit cards and other financial instruments in the country.

However, the senior administration official who gave the summary of the policy changes on the White House conference call noted Obama was "committed" to changing US posture towards Cuba since he took office in 2009 and they said the administration felt the current polecy "failed" to advance US interests.

"If any foreign policy has passed its expiration date, it is the US Cuba policy," an official who spoke on the call said. 

This policy shift comes on the heels of a prisoner swap between the US and countries. According to a senior administration official who spoke on the White House call, the swap included the release of Fross, who was accused of importing technology that is prohibited in the country in an attempt to establish a clandestine internet network for Cuban Jews. They said Gross was released on humanitarian grounds. The senior administration official also said there was a swap of "intelligence assets" between the two countries.

Additionally, the senior administration official said the US agreed to release three members of the "so-called Cuban Five," a group of Cuban intelligence officers who were arrested in Miami, Florida in 1998. Two members of the group were released prior to the swap that was announced Wednesday. In exchange, the official also said Cuba agreed to release an unnamed "US intelligence asset who has been imprisoned in Cuba for nearly 20 years." They said this "asset" provided significant information, some of which helped led to the discovery of the so-called "Wasp Network" of Cuban spies based in the US, which included the Cuban Five. 

In addition to Obama's remarks, Granma, the official newspaper of Cuba's Communist party is reporting Raul Castro, the country's president and Fidel's brother, will be making a special appearance on state television and radio to discuss relations with the US at noon on Wednesday. The senior administration official who summarized the policy changes on the White House conference call also said Castro and Obama spoke on Tuesday to finalize the details of the agreement. 

According to the official, this policy change was set in motion after a "high level channel" was opened between US and Cuban officials. They identified the Americans who opened this "channel" as Ben Rhodes, an assistant to the president and deputy national security advisor for strategic communications and speechwriting, and Ricardo Zuniga, the senior director for the Western Hemisphere on the president's national security council.

The official said "the majority" of the meetings between US and Cuban officials occurred in Canada. They also noted the Vatican hosted meetings and played a significant role supporting the talks. None of the meetings occurred in the US or Cuba. An official also said Fidel Castro, who retired in 2008 due to illness, was "not involved in the discussions."

Join the conversation about this story »

India Just Tested A Submarine Capable Of Firing Nuclear Warheads From Sea

$
0
0

India Submarine Arihant

India's nuclear capabilities may have taken a major step forward.

On Monday, India began sea trials of its first nuclear ballistic missile submarine (SSBN), according to USNI news. 

The Arihant, a 112 meter 6,000 ton SSBN, left the Indian coast and traveled into the Bay of Bengal for tests after decades of development. The program to develop the submarine has been in place since the 1970s in an effort to create an indigenous submarine that could function as a nuclear deterrent. 

"Arihant is based on the Russian Navy’s Akula-class design and can field 12 Sagarika submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM) with nuclear warheads," Sam LaGrone writes for USNI News. "The missiles are capable of a range of about 435 miles." 

India's launch of the Arihant coincides with a host of other military developments throughout South Asia. In October, India successfully tested a nuclear-capable cruise missile. Pakistan countered by carrying out a successful test of a nuclear-capable ballistic missile. 

The two nations are fierce rivals and have gone to war three times since British rule ended after World War II. A fragile ceasefire between the nations that has held since 2003 almost ended in October as both sides shelled the other over the disputed border in Kashmir. 

This mutual war footing between India and Pakistan, coupled with both nations' pursuits of nuclear weapons, has made a nuclear exchange on the subcontinent ever more likely, although still a vague possibility overall.

The eventual deployment of the Arihant may even help to stabilize relations between India and Pakistan through deterrence. SSBNs are capable of submerging at sea for months at a time, effectively allowing them to stay hidden and providing a "second-strike" capability that Pakistan currently lacks.

India's ability to launch a retaliatory strike against any Pakistani nuclear aggression would ideally convince both countries not to use their nuclear capabilities in the first place. 

SEE ALSO: Here are 6 possible nightmare scenarios for 2015 in Asia

Join the conversation about this story »

Saudi Arabia's Oil Strategy Is About More Than Destroying The US Shale Business

$
0
0

putin saudis

Saudi Arabia may not be aiming at the US in its hands-off policy toward falling oil prices. 

At a panel discussion Wednesday hosted by the Overseas Press Club and Control Risks (the latter a global risk consultancy), the speakers seemed skeptical of the idea that Saudi Arabia was refusing to prop up oil prices because it wanted to force American producers out of the market. (US shale basins are among the most expensive sources of oil to tap.)

There may be better political reasons for this move, with a reduction in American shale supply on the market just being the icing on the cake. 

The more obvious losers in the current oil climate are Iran and Russia — the former of course being Saudi Arabia's archrival in the region, and the latter being no great friend of the Saudis' either.

The pinch to shale may just be "a wonderful byproduct to screwing the Iranians and the Russians," said Michael Moran, Control Risk's managing director for global risk analysis. Further, he said, doing nothing has actually been a really smart move by the Saudis. With every move further down in price, the actions of the Saudis become more closely watched, reinforcing the country's position as the world's oil superpower. 

fiscal breakevens oil globalWhile this hurts the Iranians and the Russians, neither is likely to be crippled by it, budget-wise (Venezuela is a different story). Michael Levi, the David M. Rubenstein senior fellow for energy and the environment at the Council on Foreign Relations, noted that many of the countries who rely on substantially higher oil prices to balance their budgets nevertheless have huge reserves that will help them weather low prices for quite a while (Iran). Those countries that don't have huge reserves, he says, generally have floating currencies. As we've seen in the past few days, Russia now has a currency crisis, not a budget crisis.

As for the impact of low prices on US shale, Levi says, even if the market figures out a breakeven price for American producers (which is hard, because it varies from well to well), that's going to change in two years and even more in five years, as the technology continues to develop.

All of the above said, Levi cautions against thinking of Saudi Arabia as some sort of mastermind of the global energy story. It's unclear how many steps ahead the Saudis actually are. 

"Don't overestimate the strategy of OPEC," he says.


NOW WATCH: This Animated Map Shows How European Languages Evolved

SEE ALSO: Here's How Global Growth And Inflation Are Affected By Big Swings In Oil

Join the conversation about this story »

MARCO RUBIO: Cuba Deal Part Of Obama's 'Long Record Of Coddling Dictators And Tyrants'

$
0
0

Marco Rubio

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Florida) fiercely criticized President Barack Obama on Wednesday for moving to ease US-Cuba relations.

"It's absurd and it's part of a long record of coddling dictators and tyrants that this administration has established," Rubio said in a Fox News interview.

Rubio, a potential presidential candidate in 2016, was reacting to the White House's decision to beginning normalizing relations with the Cuban government following a prisoner swap between the two countries. Like Sen. Bob Menendez (D-New Jersey), who also slammed Obama Wednesday, Rubio warned that the deal will encourage other countries to kidnap Americans.

"It puts a price on every American abroad. Governments now know that if they can take an American hostage, they can get very significant concessions from the United States," he said.

In a separate interview with the Associated Press, Rubio further said the deal will help the Castro regime in Cuba become "permanent fixtures in Cuba for generations to come." The US has placed an economic embargo against Cuba since Fidel Castro overthrew the previous government. His brother, Raúl Castro, now leads the country.

"This is going to do absolutely nothing to further human rights and democracy in Cuba," Rubio said. "But it potentially goes a long way in providing the economic lift that the Castro regime needs to become permanent fixtures in Cuba for generations to come."

Rubio also released a lengthy statement vowing "to make every effort to block this dangerous and desperate attempt by the President to burnish his legacy at the Cuban people’s expense. "

View his full statement below:

“Today’s announcement initiating a dramatic change in U.S. policy toward Cuba is just the latest in a long line of failed attempts by President Obama to appease rogue regimes at all cost.

“Like all Americans, I rejoice at the fact that Alan Gross will be able to return to his family after five years in captivity. Although he is supposedly being released on humanitarian grounds, his inclusion in a swap involving intelligence agents furthers the Cuban narrative about his work in Cuba. In contrast, the Cuban Five were spies operating against our nation on American soil. They were indicted and prosecuted in a court of law for the crimes of espionage and were linked to the murder of the humanitarian pilots of Brothers to the Rescue. There should be no equivalence between the two, and Gross should have been released unconditionally.

“The President’s decision to reward the Castro regime and begin the path toward the normalization of relations with Cuba is inexplicable. Cuba’s record is clear. Just as when President Eisenhower severed diplomatic relations with Cuba, the Castro family still controls the country, the economy and all levers of power. This administration’s attempts to loosen restrictions on travel in recent years have only served to benefit the regime. While business interests seeking to line their pockets, aided by the editorial page of The New York Times, have begun a significant campaign to paper over the facts about the regime in Havana, the reality is clear. Cuba, like Syria, Iran, and Sudan, remains a state sponsor of terrorism. It continues to actively work with regimes like North Korea to illegally traffic weapons in our hemisphere in violation of several United Nations Security Council Resolutions. It colludes with America’s enemies, near and far, to threaten us and everything we hold dear. But most importantly, the regime’s brutal treatment of the Cuban people has continued unabated. Dissidents are harassed, imprisoned and even killed. Access to information is restricted and controlled by the regime. That is why even more than just putting U.S. national security at risk, President Obama is letting down the Cuban people, who still yearn to be free.

“I intend to use my role as incoming Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee’s Western Hemisphere subcommittee to make every effort to block this dangerous and desperate attempt by the President to burnish his legacy at the Cuban people’s expense. Appeasing the Castro brothers will only cause other tyrants from Caracas to Tehran to Pyongyang to see that they can take advantage of President Obama’s naiveté during his final two years in office. As a result, America will be less safe as a result of the President’s change in policy. When America is unwilling to advocate for individual liberty and freedom of political expression 90 miles from our shores, it represents a terrible setback for the hopes of all oppressed people around the globe.”

Join the conversation about this story »

These Are The Cuban Spies Being Released By The US

$
0
0

Cuba five

The US is on the verge of reversing one of the cornerstones of it foreign policy in the Americas. Cuba released Alan Gross, a subcontractor for the US Agency for International Development arrested in 2009, as well as an unnamed US intelligence asset imprisoned in Cuba. The individual, a Cuban national, has been in prison for the past 20 years and helped identify a number of Cuban spies operating in the US.

In return, the Castro regime secured the release of three spies held in the United States as well as the possibility of "normalized" relations with the US.

The Cuban spies' case encapsulated much of what made the American embargo policy so hard to reverse. Part of the reason the freeze in political and economic relations with the island has survived five decades and ten US presidents is Cuban intelligence's operations against the US-based exile community — Cubans whose families fled during the Castro regime's violent seizure of the island in 1959.

The Cuban spies released today were involved in Havana's attempts at undermining perceived enemies in the United States. Gerardo Hernandez, Antonio Guerrero, and Ramon Labanino were arrested in the United States in 1998 on suspicion of attempting to infiltrate US government facilities and Cuban exile groups in Florida. In a subsequent trial, the men admitted that they were Cuban intelligence agents but claimed that they had not compromised US national security.

A description of the trial in The Economist in February of 2001 suggests that the spy ring had survived for over a decade and had remarkable operational sophistication. "Witnesses in the trial have described telephone taps which recorded conversations in high-speed morse-code, and micro-dots embedded with messages," The Economist reported. The men had fabricated passports and identities convincing enough to allow them to obtain drivers licenses and even Social Security cards.

In an interview with NBC published earlier this month, Hernandez claimed that the so-called "Wasp Ring" was only working in the United States to foil attacks against Cuba plotted by anti-Castro exile groups — a legitimate concern, considering that one such group pulled a hotel bombing in Havana in 1997.

But the Economist notes that one of the accused spies was "an active member of Brothers to the Rescue and the Democracy Movement, two of the most prominent exile organisations." The most serious accusation against the spies is that they had knowledge of — or were perhaps even complicit in — the shoot-down of two planes from Brothers to the Rescue that were distributing anti-Castro literature over Cuba in 1996.

Fidel Castro

"According to court documents," the Economist notes, two members of the ring "were warned not to fly with the Brothers around the time when those two aircraft were shot down, suggesting that the attack on them was planned well in advance."

Even in recent decades Cuba has maintained intelligence capabilities far exceeding the country's relatively small size and poverty. The Wasp Ring's survival was part of a long string of Cuban intelligence successes on US soil.

 "Cuban intelligence for decades has frankly run rings around its yanqui adversaries," the scholar and former NSA officer John Schindler wrote in April of 2013, recalling the "bad day in the Intelligence Community in 1987 when the most senior intelligence defector to ever leave Havana confirmed that every single source run by the CIA in Cuba since the 1959 revolution had actually been a double agent under Cuban control."

Schindler noted Havana's success in planting agents provocateur in Cuban exile groups in the US, as well as the ability of "Fidel’s spies ... [to] stok[e] paranoia and dissent" within anti-Castro groups. But the Castro regime had also cultivated high-value assets within the US government. These included the accomplished diplomat Kendall Myers, who was arrested in 2009 for spying for the Cuba for the previous 30 years, and Ala Belen Montes, an American intelligence analyst who became influential in formulating US policy towards Cuba in the 1990s.

Schindler places Cuba in the "big four" of US counterintelligence targets, up there with the espionage heavyweights of Russia, China, and Israel.

Of course, the US-Cuba spy war went in both directions — the CIA repeatedly attempted to overthrow Castro in the 1960s, and USAID was recently caught attempting to set up online social networks that would undermine the island's communist government.

Less acrimonious relations between the US and Cuba would take away much of the sides' motives for spying on the other; the upcoming negotiations over a new dispensation between the countries could also include understandings on intelligence activities.

But the spies released today, and the recent history of Cuban activities in the US, are a reminder of just how long mistrust and even outright hostility has simmered between Havana and Washington — and of the weighty issues the two sides must resolve as they work towards eventual normalization.

SEE ALSO: Marco Rubio isn't happy with the Cuba deal

Join the conversation about this story »

The 20 Most Homicidal Countries In The World

$
0
0

mexico drug violence

The United Nations and the World Health Organization have released their 2014 Global Status Report on Violence Prevention, which paints a bleak and detailed picture of murder and violence around the world.

Worldwide in 2012, there were 475,000 murder victims, 60% of whom were males between 15 and 44 years old. Half of all homicide victims are killed by a firearm, and Latin America is the world's most murderous region.

The global homicide rate for 2012 stood at 6.7 per 100,000 inhabitants — slightly lower than the 2011 rate of 6.9.

20. Zimbabwe

15.1 murders per 100,000 people

33% killed by firearms

Political violence has become a fact of life in Zimbabwe, where President Robert Mugabe has ruled with a heavy hand for over 30 years.

Mugabe ordered the takeover of white-owned farms in 2000, causing an economic collapse that still has lingering effects. Unemployment hit 90% by 2008.



19. Iraq

18.6 murders per 100,000 people

45% killed by firearms

Close to 8,000 civilians were killed in the first two months of the Iraq war, according to Iraq Body Count. Since 2003, the number of civilians killed every month has lowered significantly, but this war-torn nation remains one of the most homicidal on earth. 

The civilian death rate remained relatively low from 2008 through 2012 but has crept back up since 2013 and the rise of the Islamic State. Roughly 1,351 Iraqi civilians were killed every month in 2014.



18. Panama

19.3 murders per 100,000 people

80% killed by firearms

Panama's gangs and drug traffickers are responsible for roughly 23% of its homicides each year, according to a 2013 Overseas Security Advisory Council (OSAC) Crime and Safety report. The country is still safer than some other central American countries, like Honduras and Guatemala. 

 



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

A Tycoon In Iraq Is Building A $20 Million Replica Of The White House Miles From ISIS Strongholds

$
0
0

A Kurdish business tycoon is building a $20 million replica of the White House in a swanky neighborhood in Erbil, Iraq. The knockoff is situated not 50 miles away from ISIS-held Mosul.

Shihab Shihab, a Kurdish business tycoon, commissioned the mansion to be built with Greek marble instead of sandstone, and while it is smaller than the original White House at 32,300 square feet, the home comes complete with a 9-foot crystal chandelier, 21-karat gold ceilings, and a Turkish bath. 

Shihab dreams of Obama coming to visit the house in Kurdistan one day. "If Obama comes, I will invite him to come here," Shihab told NPR. "We will invite him to have Erbil kebab and fish."

Here's a peek inside the construction: 

The mansion is being built in Erbil's Dream City, a luxury neighbourhood in northern Iraq lined with million-dollar villas.iraq white house

The mansion is slightly smaller than the actual White House, measuring 32,300 square feet instead of 55,000 square feet. The home's columns have been finished with 21-karat gold leaf.iraq white house

The banister of the home's grand staircase, as well as the ceiling, have also been trimmed with 21-karat gold.iraq white house

A large swimming pool is just one of many features Shihab has made on his replica of the White House.iraq white house

A Turkish bath, decorated with intricate Turkish tiles, is another.iraq white house

Shihab hopes people will talk about his copy as much as they talk about the real White House. He plans to make this colorful room the gym.iraq white house

The home will have two master bedrooms, but Shihab doesn't remember how many rooms the mansion has total — he told NPR it's so big, he can't keep track.iraq white house

When a buyer offered to pay $17 million for the mansion back in October, Shihab reportedly refused, according to the NY Daily News.iraq white house

"I wanted a house people would talk about," Shihab told NPR. "I wanted to create a new landmark that rivals the Citadel. And I think if you have money you should live in luxury."iraq white house

SEE ALSO: A Look Inside The Abandoned Factory That Caused The Worst Industrial Disaster In History

FOLLOW US: Business Insider is on Twitter!

Join the conversation about this story »

The Pentagon Once Considered False-Flag Attacks To Justify An Invasion Of Cuba

$
0
0

Fidel Castro

The US is moving towards ending its 50-year political and economic embargo on Cuba, a breakthrough in American relations with the island nation.

But at the height of the Cold War, the US was panicked over the prospect of a communist regime less than 100-miles from its territory. And in 1962, three years after Fidel Castro and his allies had successfully carried out their Communist revolution in Cuba, the US Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) proposed a number of measures aimed at legitimizing a US invasion of the island.

The majority of these measures involved false-flag attacks that would give the US the leeway needed to carry out regime change in Havana. 

In an unclassified memo titled "Justification for US Military Intervention in Cuba," the JCS floats a number of actions that the US could execute which would "develop an international image of a Cuban threat to peace in the Western Hemisphere." 

The plans were developed under the name "Operation Mongoose," with an emphasis on the namesake animal's speed: The JCS wanted to carry out these operations, thereby legitimizing attacks on Cuba, before Havana and the Soviet Union established bilateral mutual support agreements. The report was released in March, seven months before the start of the Cuban Missile Crisis. 

The JCS suggested eight ideas for legitimizing an invasion of the island. Many of them are far-fetched, and the more outlandish ones weren't operationalized. But they offer a glimpse into the US's sometimes-paranoid approach to the very real strategic challenges that the island's communist takeover presented.

A simulated attack on Guantanamo Bay 

In order to justify an invasion, the JCS proposed simulating "a series of well-coordinated incidents ... in and around Guantanamo" that would "give genuine appearance of being done by hostile Cuban forces."

These incidents would include burning aircraft on base, blowing up ammunition inside the base and starting fires, staging riots near the base's main gate with the help of friendly Cubans, sabotaging a ship in the harbor, and capturing a group of friendly Cubans disguised as saboteurs inside the base.

A 'Remember the Maine'-type incident

In addition to simulated sabotage at Guantanamo Bay, the JCS floated an idea of destroying a US vessel entirely and blaming the attack on the Cubans. It's an echo of the destruction of the USS Maine in 1898, which was used as a justification for the Spanish-American War (It's now believed that the explosion that destroyed the ship was in fact accidental.)

One of the ideas proposed was to "blow up a US ship in Guantanamo Bay." A second idea was to destroy an unmanned US vessel somewhere in Cuban waters close to Havana or Santiago. 

"The presence of Cuban planes or ships merely investigating the intent of the vessel could be fairly compelling evidence that the ship was taken under attack." After the explosion, the US could then stage a mock rescue attempt. Afterwards, mock "casualty lists in US newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation."

A coordinated terror campaign

"We could develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington. The terror campaign could be pointed at Cuban refugees seeking haven in the United States. We could sink a boatload of Cubans enroute to Florida (real or simulated) … Exploding a few plastic bombs in carefully chosen spots … would be helpful in projecting the idea of an irresponsible government."

A simulated Cuban attack on a neighboring country

The JCS proposed carrying out an attack on a neighboring Caribbean nation while disguised as Cuban forces. This attack would show that Cuba was a reckless spear's-tip for Communist expansionism in the region. 

Harassment of civilian air lines

US pilots could be trained to fly in a Cuban MiG aircraft. The pilot would then carry out simulated harassment of civilian airliners. 

"An F-86 properly painted would convince air passengers that they saw a Cuban MIG," the JCS proposed, "especially if the pilot of the transport were to announce such fact." 

Simulated hijacking attempts

"Hijacking attempts against civil air and surface craft should appear to continue as harassing measures condoned by the government of Cuba. Concurrently, genuine deflections of Cuban civil and military air and surface craft should be encouraged." 

A simulated downing of a chartered jet

"It is possible to create an incident which will demonstrate convincingly that a Cuban aircraft jas attacked and shot down a chartered civil airliner enroute from the United States to Jamaica, Guatemala, Panama or Venezuela," the JCS wrote. 

An actual civilian airliner, flying from a proprietary CIA company in the Miami area, would be loaded with selected passengers with aliases. This plane would then be swapped out at Eglin Air Force Base and would be replaced with an identical unmanned aircraft. The drone, once over Cuba, would release a May Day signal before being detonated through a radio signal. 

A simulated attack by Cuban forces over international waters

"It is possible to create an incident which will make it appear that Communist Cuban MiGs have destroyed a USAF [air force] aircraft over international waters in an unprovoked attack," wrote the JCS. 

According to this plan, four or five F-101s would fly from Florida to the vicinity of Cuba, before changing direction back to the US. Of the five pilots, one would have been briefed to fly at the tail end of the formation far from the other aircraft. 

This pilot would then signal that he had been attacked by Cuban MiGs and was going down, after which he would make no other calls. The pilot would then fly at low altitude directly to Eglin Air Force Base. 

Meanwhile, a submarine would disburse F-101 parts approximately "15 to 20 miles off the Cuban coast and depart. The pilots returning to Homestead would have a true story as far as they knew." 

You can read the full JCS memo here»

H/t Micah Zenko

SEE ALSO: Here are 3 big policy changes in US-Cuba relations

Join the conversation about this story »

Colombia's Marxist Rebels Just Called An Indefinite Ceasefire After 50 Years Of War

$
0
0

FARC soldier rebel gunman Colombia

BOGOTA (Reuters) - Colombia's Marxist FARC rebels have declared an indefinite unilateral ceasefire "which should transform into an armistice," the group said in a statement posted on its website on Wednesday.

The FARC is in the midst of peace talks with the government to end five decades of war which have killed more than 220,000 people.

The talks have been held in Havana since 2010 but were only made public in 2012. According to the Council on Foreign Relations, the talks, which also involve Cuba, Norway, Venezuela, Chile, managed to reach agreements on key underlying sources of conflict in Colombia's rural areas, including land reform and drug trafficking enforcement.

FARC delcared a unilateral ceasefire in the runup to Colombia's presidential elections in June of 2014, which saw the re-election of the pro-peace process Juan Miguel Santos. But it was followed by renewed lefitst guerilla attacks later in the summer that included the kidnapping of an army general. As CFR notes, peace talks have stalled on the crucial issues of the guerilla group's disarmament and the compensation of victims on both sides of the conflict.

The unilateral ceasefire delcaration comes just hours after the US announced it was moving towards ending its 50-year-old policy of political and economic embargo against Cuba.

(Reporting by Julia Symmes Cobb and Peter Murphy; Editing by Leslie Adler)

SEE ALSO: These are the Cuban spies the US is releasing

Join the conversation about this story »

The Army Is Launching A Pair Of Billion-Dollar Surveillance Blimps Over I-95

$
0
0

Jlens blimp Raytheon

Next week, residents in the Baltimore area will wake up to a major surprise: Two massive Army airships that will be visible from Interstate 95 for the next three years.

Tethered at the Army's Aberdeen Proving Ground 25 miles northeast of Baltimore, the airships will quickly become an uncomfortable fact of life for Americans living in the Northeast. The massive airships, each about three times the size of a Goodyear blimp, are the latest in aerial surveillance. 

The blimps, built by Raytheon and known as JLENS — Joint Land Attack Cruise Missile Defense Elevated Netted Sensor Systems — will defend against possible cruise missile attacks and other potential threats to Washington, DC and other East Coast cities through the use of extremely high-detailed radar imaging.

The two blimps will function in concert. One of them will provide constant 360-degree scanning, covering a circular area from North Carolina to central Ohio to upstate New York even as the blimp remains stationary over suburban Baltimore. The other will focus on more specific targets. All together, JLENS will be able to track missiles, aircraft, and drones in a 340-mile radius. 

Neither blimp will carry weapons. But the surveillance they provide would be relayed to air, ground, and ship-based weapons which would be used to intercept an incoming cruise missile. 

JLENS

Some worry that the airships could actually invade upon the privacy of people living under them.

“There’s something inherently suspect for the public to look up in the sky and see this surveillance device hanging there,” Ginger McCall, associate director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), told Dan Froomkin of The Intercept. “It’s the definition of persistent surveillance.”

Currently the JLENS has no optical or audio recording equipment; these tools are unnecessary for its main function. Moreover, as the JLENS currently operates, the blimps are incapable of being used to track individuals or provide useful material for invasive surveillance against citizens. 

“Radars can tell that something is moving, but because of the way radars work, they simply can’t determine identifying characteristics of cars, such as make, model or color,” Raytheon told The Intercept. “Along similar lines, they can’t tell who is driving the vehicle or see a license plate.”

That could change if cameras were added to the JLENS. However, there is currently no indication that this will occur. 

Privacy concerns aside, the blimps are massively expensive.

So far, the JLENS project has cost the government $2.8 billion. Congress has approved another $43.3 million for the first year of the JLENS operational test. 

RTR3D922

The astounding price of the JLENS may eventually yield returns, at least when their cost is compared to other alternatives. The Raytheon radars used in the blimps have the surveillance capability of five spy planes, but require only half the manpower and cost 700% less. 

“If you’re a commander, you want as much advance warning as possible,” retired Army Brig. Gen. Keith McNamara, told Raytheon. “You need to know where those missiles came from as quickly as possible so you can neutralize that launcher and prevent it from firing again.”

The use of blimps has a long history in the US military. The US first used airships along the Mexican border in the 1920s, and more recently blimps have been outfitted with extreme high-definition cameras and radar to watch for Taliban attacks in Afghanistan. 

SEE ALSO: 15 astounding technologies DARPA is creating right now

Join the conversation about this story »

The US-Cuba Embargo Created A Bizarre World Where Waiters And Artists Are The Richest People

$
0
0

Cuban waiter

After more than 50 years of halted diplomatic relations between Cuba and the US, President Obama announced today that the situation would finally start to normalize. 

"We will end an outdated approach that for decades has failed to advance our interests," he said in a statement at the White House.

The embargo, however, didn't just fail to help. It turned Cuba's social structure completely upside-down.

In Cuba today, native Cuban and renowned photographer Tony Mendoza tells Business Insider, waiters and artists sit at the top of the socioeconomic ladder. "It's a hilarious society because ... these people are the classes that are the wealthiest individuals," he explains. 

Ironically, Fidel Castro, equally a socialist and a nationalist, sought to elevate the working man — every working man. In reality, his rebellion in 1953 sparked years of political and economic suppression and foreign aid.

Furthermore, the incentive structure ended up being all wrong.

First of all, waiters in Cuba receive tips directly from tourists, according to Mendoza, which boosts their incomes. In general, tourism, a "non-state" sector, is essential to Cuba's economy. In 2012, 2.8 million visitors flooded the country, accounting for nearly $3 billion in revenue. With the embargo lifting, American tourists can soon join the fun.

Similarly, Mendoza says Cuba has permitted artists to hold exhibitions abroad, free of the government's watchful eyes. "They're the cultural reps of Cuba," Mendoza says. According to him, artists keep about 50% of their earnings. 

"The embargo was a disaster because the people who were free of kissing the government's ass and who were independent of the government salary were the wealthiest," Mendoza adds.

Aside from those two careers, most people receive a state salary of $20 a month."Everybody has to break the law to survive. There is no more morality," Mendoza explains. "Because $20 is not enough."

For example, if you work at a gas station, you might siphon off some gas during the day to sell later. Or contractors often steal concrete blocks. "Everybody does it," Mendoza says. 

Castro birthday Cuba 1996

In 1996, when Mendoza went back to his homeland for the first time since leaving in 1960, he flew into Santiago and hired a driver to travel to Havana. Not once did his driver stop at a gas station for fuel. He would pull up in front of random houses, make small talk, and then the resident would grab a small tank of gas and fill the car. 

Julia Cooke also chronicled Cuba's bizarre transformation in her 2013 book "The Other Side of Paradise: Life In The New Cuba." 

"In order to get any simple commodity, you have to figure who's selling it, and who needs to be buying it," she wrote, as NPR noted. One of her friends even gave her the phone number of a black market food provider, selling blue cheese, Parmesan, Serrano ham, and smoked salmon. 

At this point, Cuba didn't really have a choice but to kiss and make-up with the US because the entire economy depends on a state about to collapse. 

"When I came back," Mendoza says," it was so clear to me that the embargo was a disaster, and it didn't work."

SEE ALSO: Cuba Didn't Have A Choice Anymore

Join the conversation about this story »

Viewing all 27697 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>